Sun. Oct 18th, 2026
From the NewsForce247 Archive — originally published March 3, 2026. Stories move to the archive automatically after four weeks; they remain searchable and shareable.
Marion Defendant Seeks to Disqualify Judge in Pending Criminal Case
MARION, Ohio — Brendan Damron has filed an affidavit with the Supreme Court of Ohio seeking to have Marion County Common Pleas Judge Todd Anderson disqualified from presiding over his pending criminal case, State of Ohio v. Brendan Damron (Case No. 2026 CR 0059).

The affidavit, filed March 2, 2026, and docketed as Supreme Court Case No. 26AD041, asks Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy to remove Judge Anderson from the case due to what Damron describes as apparent bias and conflicts of interest.

Advertise your business here

In his sworn statement, Damron alleges that Judge Anderson has longstanding personal and professional relationships with individuals connected to the case, including law enforcement officers and the Marion County Sheriff’s Office. The filing references Anderson’s past role as a defense attorney in matters the defendant previously investigated, as well as his campaign support and participation in Fraternal Order of Police events.

“Disqualification is warranted under Ohio law where a judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” Damron wrote, citing concerns over “actual bias or the appearance of bias” and a conflict of interest involving officers and the agencies under investigation in the criminal matter.

Advertise your business here

The affidavit also mentions that Matthew Bayles, lead investigator and Sheriff of Marion County, previously endorsed and campaigned for Judge Anderson — a connection Damron argues creates a conflict since the Marion City Police Department, Bayles’ former employer, is the defendant in the case.

Advertise your business here

The motion asks the Chief Justice to assign a new judge to oversee future proceedings and take any administrative action necessary to effectuate reassignment. It was filed just after Damron’s arraignment, held on the same day.

As of now, the Supreme Court of Ohio has not issued a decision regarding the request.

Advertise your business here
— NewsForce247.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *